Sites like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia in which everyone may start a page on any topic, or edit one. The article is then checked by an editor who determines if the content is staying or not.
The platform is also accessible in several languages and to access the site you do not have to understand English. It is one of the most commonly visited sites, normally the Wikipedia article is most often the first item of the search results while you’re looking for information on Google.
Nearly any page can be modified by someone and you are urged to be brave. Figure something to improve to make things perfect for example spelling, grammar, readability editing, inserting material, or deleting unconstructive changes.
When you choose to include additional information, please seek to include sources for clarification, or recommend them on the topic page of the post. Changes to contentious subjects and main sections on Wikipedia would usually be discussed first. Contributing to Wikipedia would provide you with the means to use report on and add to Wikipedia on all the basics needed.
There are many processes in effect to support representatives of Wikipedia carry out the vital task of providing a high-quality tool while maintaining civility. Editors can watch pages, and technically qualified individuals can write editing programs to keep track of or rectify bad edits.
Where there are differences about how to view evidence, editors also work together to assemble an article that is relatively reflective of current expert opinion on the subject. Prior to contributing to the project, aspiring authors may wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia information.
Although the site is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is largely uninvolved in the daily operations and writing. There is also a mobile edition of the website that renders the page for phone screens perfectly.
So if you choose to become very minimalistic, you may have pages with no connections, or just connections. Wikipedia appears to have thought of any possible scenario. If you are searching for a particular kind of online encyclopedia, consider these sites like Wikipedia mentioned below.
sites like Wikipedia
1. ABOUT.COM
About.com is an American interactive media organization site like Wikipedia that publishes content and videos on different topics across genres, including fitness, home, food, finance, technology, fashion, lifestyle, travel and education.
About.com re-imagines how users receive professional tips and web responses. Via their premium vertical brands, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and www.about.com the main website, they support millions of consumers address concerns, fix challenges, and find insight on topics that they care about profoundly. About.com is a business operated by IAC.
Since the start of About.com, everything has improved, but the core concept is still the same. Primedia acquired the business for around $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, more than 40 percent of the subject pages were locked. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m.
About.com also has a rather modern front page and has a large search box and provides many directions to locate valuable material. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the platforms (ranging from cars to video games), discover existing subjects in an alphabetical index, or see what is hot now. The website promises 750 experts around to guide you and each issue has a podcast, a newsletter and a platform for readers.
The web has undoubtedly changed even more since About.com began. Google helps users to browse through millions of places for content, because they don’t need it all in one location. Wikipedia helps you to easily look stuff up, so there are plenty of different sites that provide much more extensive information than About.com. But About.com is still one of the top content sites in the United States, attracting 38 million unique visitors a month, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% female.
2. SCHOLARPEDIA
Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia, authored and maintained by worldwide scholarly experts. This is also among the popular sites like Wikipedia.
Scholarpedia is inspired by Wikipedia and seeks to supplement it by offering in-depth scholarly study of mathematics and science subjects like physical, chemical, behavioral and social sciences.
In several cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are alike for example, both require someone to propose revisions to almost any object, both are “wikis” and uses the popular program MediaWiki for Wikipedia, all permit substantial freedom inside the “Chat” sections of every article, Both are committed to make awareness of the universe widely accessible to all.
However, Scholarpedia is better illustrated by how it is from other wikis, the distinctions that result from the scholarly context, aims, and audience of Scholarpedia. Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing method is the most significant. All publications in Scholarpedia are either in the method of being written by a team of scholars, or have already been released and are subject to professional curation.
Before publishing, first of all, all new publications must be supported to affirm the writers’ credibility, reputation and capacity to compose them, each article is subject to a scholarly peer review and requires the public approval of at least two scholarly experts.
After publishing, articles appear in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be cited as any other scholarly article. The visibility of potential revisions to an article shall be managed by the Curator of the document, typically the most known expert of the article at the time of publication.
If a revision of an article by any person is approved, the individual enters a group of known as non-author article contributors. The team of article contributors may act in the Curator’s stead from time to time and a replacement Curator is chosen when an article curator steps aside or is otherwise unable to work.
This hybrid approach allows articles from Scholarpedia to serve as a walkway between traditional peer-reviewed journals and more flexible and up-to – date wikis without compromising on quality or reliability. It aims to remove the disincentives that discourage academics from engaging in online publishing and productive discussion about the topics they know best. Visit Scholarpedia on www.scholarpedia.org to learn more about the platform.
3. INFOPLEASE
Infoplease is a well know website like Wikipedia for information and learning, which also combines the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and many almanacs filled with details, facts and historical records. The platform’s editors constantly refresh and improve this huge array of knowledge to offer you accurate and credible details as well as introducing new findings and recognizing patterns.
The content is written and published by professional editors, and since its inception, the site has received numerous awards and accolades. For knowledge on a range of topics, such as current news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians turn to Infoplease by clicking www.infoplease.com
All of the information found on the site is collected from trusted sources, such as the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While entries may be limited in size compared to Wikipedia, you can be sure all the information is accurate and unable to be influenced by external users. Infoplease also has many multimedia features that help researchers, especially students attending distance education courses.
To request permission from your website to reproduce text, photos or maps for use in other publications, simply submit the application form for Permissions. Make your question as clear and comprehensive as practicable, and quote the appropriate URL. Remember, however, that much of the maps and images on the website are acquired by third parties, and so do not have the licensing rights.
Infoplease is an excellent reference place for children, and provides them with entertainment and educational services, particularly at the Homework Centre. Children will really love their separate, award winning Factmonster website, which is tailor made for children aged between 8 to14 years.
5. CONSERVAPEDIA
Conservapedia is a platform established to be and continues to portray itself as a conservative and Christian fundamentalist alternative to Wikipedia, although it is now effectively a blog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist community. God-King Andrew Schlafly founded the website in 2006 out of his conviction that Wikipedia is deceptively infected with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], because obviously the only way to overcome actual or perceived prejudice is to build a website that is skewed in the opposite direction.
The overwhelming majority of papers on this platform go out of their way to blame pretty much all bad on “liberals” and so essentially used as a grab all snarl word for everyone and everyone that argues with them just about any particular topic-this appears to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / evolution.
While some editors appear to be legitimately interested in building a comprehensive encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and a few other trusted active editors / Admins are mainly using it to promote their own views and pet causes.
Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to toe the party line on any given issue, including the use of un-Murican British spelling is considered to be evidence that one is an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.
Also see: Sites Like Chegg and Alternatives
The front page of Conservapedia is also full of unfounded discrimination directed against atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several other oppressed communities and its administrators. Visit www.consevapedia.com to know more about the platform.
Summary
Wikipedia is one of the biggest and most popular Web sites, with mirror versions in 251 languages. However, owing to weaknesses in its fully accessible-content system, the impact of Wikipedia has at times been a dangerous one. While the web can be a reasonable starting point for study, at least now you are aware that several other sites like Wikipedia exist.
