Sites like | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like is an American interactive media organization that provides suggestions on different topics in form of articles and clips. The subjects could be on food, workout, finance technology and so on. It has a user friendly interface and it is easy to find information on this site.

In case you will like to take a look at some other similar sites. There are so many popular sites like online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of alternatives have all the features that can be found on and more.

Below are the sites like


Wikipedia is among the web based encyclopedia sites comparable to where everyone can start a page on any kind of subject, or perhaps edit one. The article is then checked by an editor who ascertains whether the article is staying or not.

The podium is also available in several languages and to access the website you do not have to understand English. It’s probably the most commonly visited websites, usually the Wikipedia commentary is often times the very first item of the search engine results while you are looking for information on Google.

Nearly every webpage can be modified by someone and you are advised to be courageous. Figure something to enhance to make things perfect for example punctuation, grammar, legibility editing, inserting information, or even erasing unconstructive changes.

When you choose to include more info, please aim to include sources for further clarification, or even recommend them on the topic site of the article. Changes to controversial topics and main sections on Wikipedia will usually be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the means to use report on and add to Wikipedia on all the fundamentals needed.

There are many procedures in essence to support officials of Wikipedia perform the vital exercise of providing a high-quality technique while keeping calmness. Editors can observe sites, and technically certified people could create modifying programs to keep track of or rectify weak edits.

Where there’re differences about how to find info, editors work collectively to assemble an article that’s relatively refractive of present professional opinion about the subject. Prior to contributing to the project, prospective writers might wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia info.

Though the site is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it’s largely uninvolved in the daily operations and writing. There’s also a flexible version of the website which renders the site for phone screens perfectly. Therefore if you choose to be very minimalistic, you may have sites with no connections, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to possess thought of any feasible scenario. If you’re searching for a particular kind of web based encyclopedia, check out these Wikipedia substitutes stated below.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia comparable to, authored and also maintained by worldwide scholarly pros. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and also tries to supplement it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and science subjects such as physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In various cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for example, both equally need somebody to propose revisions to virtually any subject, both are “wikis” and employs the popular process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all permit substantial freedom within the “Chat” sectors of all post,  Both are committed to make cognizance of the community widely available to everybody.

Even so, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it’s from different wikis, the variations that spring from the scholarly framework, aims, as well as viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing technique is the most vital. All publications in Scholarpedia are either in the system of being written by a group of scholars, or have previously been released and are under professional curation.

Prior posting, firstly, new articles has to be supported to prove the writers’ reliability, status and also ability to write them, every article is susceptible to a scholarly peer analysis and requires people’s approval of at least 2 scholarly experts.

Soon after posting, information surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be cited just like any other scholarly article. The awareness of potential revisions to an article shall be governed by the Curator of the information, typically the most renowned professional of the article during the time of release.

When a review of an article by any individual is certified, the person enters a team referred to as non-author article contributors. The team of article contributors may act in the Curator’s stead periodically also a replacement Curator is elected when an editorial curator steps aside or is  otherwise unable to do the job.

This crossbreed method enables information from Scholarpedia to serve as a walkway amid standard peer-reviewed publications and more versatile and up-to-date wikis without reducing on excellence or reliability. It intends to eradicate the disincentives that deter academics from engaging in online writing and effective debate on the subjects they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on for more information on the website.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a well know site like for info and education, which also combines the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and many almanacs stuffed with details, facts and also historical information. The platform’s editors constantly renew and advance this huge choice of information to provide adequate and reputable information and also introducing new findings and learning habits.

The information is written and posted by qualified authors, also, since its creation, they have gained multiple prizes and honors. For information on a variety of topics, such as current news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians turn to Infoplease by exploring

All the information found on the website is amassed from reliable sources, like the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. Though entries may be limited in size when compared with Wikipedia, it is certain all the details is appropriate and unable to be influenced by external users. Infoplease also has many multimedia attributes that help researchers, especially students enrolled in distance education courses.

To request authorization from your website to recreate text, photos or even maps for use in some other articles, kindly send the application form for Permissions. Make your question as obvious and comprehensive as practicable, and quote the right Link. Remember, however, that much of the maps and images on the site are acquired by third parties, and thus do not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a good reference location for youngsters, and provides them with amusement and educative services, particularly at the Homework Centre. Children will definitely enjoy their independent, award winning Factmonster website, which is customized for children aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is a website established to be and proceeds to depict itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist alternative to, even though it is now basically a website of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly launched the site in 2006 from his conviction that Wikipedia is stealthily inflamed with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since obviously the only way to defeat real or observed prejudice is to create a site that is skewed in the opposing direction.

The enormous majority of articles on this site go out of their way to blame pretty much all bad on “liberals” and so  essentially used as a grab all snarl term for everybody and everyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this appears to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / advancement.

While some editors seem to be legitimately keen on building a comprehensive encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and some other known productive editors / Admins are mostly using it to enhance their own views and pet causes. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to toe the party line on any kind of subject, such as the use of un-Murican British spelling is regarded as evidence that one is an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The home page of Conservapedia is also full of unproven discrimination focused towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several different oppressed communities and its administrators. Explore to know more information on the platform.

Visit the site here:

5. ABOUT.COM is an American interactive media organization that posts articles and clips on diverse subjects across genres, such as workout, home, food, finance, technology, fashion, lifestyle, travel as well as education. re-imagines how users receive professional guides and web responses. Via their premium vertical varieties, such as Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and also the primary site, they help numerous clients deal with issues, fix obstacles, and find insight on subjects which they cherish tremendously. is a business operated by IAC.

Ever since the beginning of, everything has upgraded, however the main process is still the same. Primedia obtained the company for about $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it in accordance with Wikipedia, about 40 percent of the subject pages were closed. It was then bought out by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. also has a rather modern front page and has a large search box and provides many guidelines to find important information. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the websites (ranging from cars to video games), discover available subjects in an alphabetical index, or find what’s trending now. The site boasts 750 experts around to guide you and each subject has got a podcast, a newsletter plus a platform for customers.

The web has certainly udgraded even more since started. Google aids clients to browse through numerous websites for content, because they do not need it all-in-one site. Wikipedia aids you to easily look stuff up, so there are loads of different sites which provide much more extensive info more than Though is still one of the top information websites in the United States, generating Thirty-eight million unique users monthly, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:

In conclusion is one of the largest and most popular Sites, with replicate models diverse languages. But, owing to weaknesses in its well accessible-content system, the influence of has oftentimes ended up a risky one. Even though the website can be quite a reasonable kick off point for study, at least now you know that some other alternatives to exist.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles