Sites like Baidu Baike | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Baidu Baike. Baidu Baike was launched in June 20, 2006 by the Chinese technology company Baidu. This is a a Chinese-language collaborative online encyclopedia that serves as an alternative in China. It is a well trusted and popular amongst the Chinese as it serves as a kind of certification to businesses.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Baidu Baike similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Baidu Baike online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Baidu Baike alternatives have all the features that can be found on Baidu Baike and more.

Below are the sites like Baidu Baike.


Wikipedia is one of the web based encyclopedia sites comparable to Baidu Baike where everyone may start a page on any kind of topic, or perhaps edit one. The article is however checked by an editor who ascertains if the content is staying or not. The software is also accessible in various languages in order to access the website you don’t have to understand English. It’s probably the most commonly visited websites,usually the Wikipedia article is often times the first item of the search results while you are trying to find information on Google.

Practically every page can be modified by somebody and you are urged to be courageous. Find something to enhance to make things perfect for example punctuation, grammar, readability touch-ups, inserting material, or even deleting unconstructive modifications.

If you select to incorporate additional information, make sure you seek to include sources for clarification, or refer them on the topic page of the article. Modifications to contentious topics and primary sectors on Wikipedia will primarily be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia would provide you with the means to utilize review on and also contribute to Wikipedia on all the basics needed.

There are numerous procedures in essence to aid representatives of Wikipedia perform the vital task of supplying a quality technique while maintaining calmness. Editors can watch pages, and theoretically competent individuals could write editing programs to hold a record of or perhaps resolve weak modifications. Where there are differences on how to find information, editors also work collectively to build a commentary that is rather reflective of current professional view on the subject. Before adding to the project, aspiring authors might wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia tips.

Although the site is actually owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is basically uninvolved in the daily operations and writing.There’s also a flexible version of the website that renders the site for phone screens perfectly. Thus if you choose to be very modest, you could have pages with no links, or just connections. Wikipedia appears to possess knowledge of any feasible scenario.If you’re searching for a particular kind of online encyclopedia, consider these Wikipedia substitutes mentioned below.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is an American active media firm which publishes articles and videos on diverse subjects across genres, such as workout, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, vacation as well as education. It is also one of the best Baidu Baike alternatives on the internet. re-imagines how clients receive professional tips and web feedback. Via their premium vertical products, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and also the main website, they aid many clients deal with issues, fix challenges, and get insight on subjects that they care about greatly. is a business run by IAC.

Ever since the start of, stuff has improved, though the core process remains the same. Primedia acquired the company for about $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, about 40 % of the content pages were locked. It was then bought out by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. also has a rather modern front page and possesses a large search box and offers various guidelines to locate important information. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the websites (which range from cars to video games), find available topics in an alphabetical index, and also see what’s trending now. The site promises 750 experts around to guide you and every subject has got a podcast, a newsletter plus a platform for readers.

The website has certainly improved more since began. Google helps users to browse through numerous websites for content, because they do not need it all in one location. Wikipedia aids you to quickly look stuff up, thus there are lots of various sites that provide more extensive info than However , is still one of the best content websites in the U . S ., generating 38 million unique visitors per month, 61% turn out to be college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia just like Baidu Baike, developed and managed by worldwide scholarly specialists. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and also strives to supplement it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and science subjects including physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In most cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for example, both equally need a person to endorse revisions to virtually any subject, they are both “wikis” and also uses the popular program MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all allow substantial mobility in the “Chat” sectors of any article,  Both are committed to create awareness of the arena broadly available to everybody.

Even so, Scholarpedia is better illustrated by how it’s from other wikis, the differences which spring from the scholarly context, aims, as well as viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing method is the most important. All publications in Scholarpedia are either in the method of being written by a team of scholars, or have already been published and are under professional curation.

Prior publishing, firstly, new publications has to be endorsed to validate the writers’ reliability, reputation and also ability to compose them, each article is subject to a scholarly peer evaluation and needs the public approval of about two scholarly experts.

Soon after publishing, information surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and could be cited as any other scholarly editorial. The awareness of possible revisions to an information shall be governed by the Curator of the document, usually the most renowned professional of the commentary at the time of release.

When a review of an article by any individual is approved, the person joins a group known as non-author article contributors. The group of article members can work in the Curator’s stead from time to time also a substitute Curator is elected when an article curator retires or is  actually unable to do the job.

This crossbreed process allows articles from Scholarpedia to function as a path amid standard peer-reviewed journals and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without reducing on quality or reliability. It aspires to remove the disincentives which discourage academics from engaging in web based writing and productive discussion about the topics they know best. Visit Scholarpedia on to learn more about the site.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a well know site similar to Baidu Baike for information and learning, which also combines the elements of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and many almanacs packed with details, tips and historical records. The platform’s editors constantly renew and advance this huge choice of information to offer you reliable and credible information and also introducing new results and recognizing patterns.

The content is written and published by professional editors, and since its inception, they have received many awards and honors. For knowledge on a range of topics, like current reports, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians go to Infoplease by visiting

All of the data on the site is gathered from reliable sources, like the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and also the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While articles may be minimal in proportion when compared with Wikipedia, you can be sure all the details is reliable and can not be influenced by external visitors. Infoplease has various multimedia benefits that help researchers, especially students attending online courses.

To request approval from your website to replicate text, photos or maps for use in some other articles, simply send the application form for Permissions. Make your question as apparent and comprehensive as feasible, and cite the appropriate URL. Remember, however, that much of the maps and images on the site are acquired by third parties, and so will not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a good reference location for children, and provides them with entertainment and informative services, specifically at the Homework Centre. Kids will really love their separate, top rated Factmonster site, that is tailor made for children aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is a website created to be and proceeds to depict itself as a conservative and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Baidu Baike, although it is now successfully a blog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly established the site in 2006 out of his certainty that Wikipedia is stealthily contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], because obviously the best way to defeat real or perceived prejudice is to create a website that is manipulated in the opposite direction.

The enormous number of articles on this podium go out of their way to condemn pretty much all bad on “liberals” and so  essentially used to be a grab all snarl term for everybody and anyone that argues with them  just about any particular topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / evolution.

Although some editors appear to be frankly interested in building a comprehensive encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and some other trusted active publishers / Admins are mainly utilizing it to enhance their own thoughts and pet factors. Washed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to foot the party line on any kind of subject, such as the use of un-Murican British spelling is considered proof that one is an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The home page of Conservapedia is stuffed with unproven discrimination focused towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several different oppressed groups and its moderators. Visit to learn more information on the website.

Visit the site here:

In conclusion

Baidu Baike is probably the largest and most renowned Web sites, with mirror versions diverse languages. But, owing to weaknesses in its well accessible-content program, the influence of Baidu Baike has oftentimes ended up a dangerous one. While the site can be quite a fair kick off point for exploration, certainly now you are aware that some other substitutes to Baidu Baike are available.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles