Sites like Britannica | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Britannica. Britannica was established in 1768 and is a general knowledge online encyclopedia. It is the oldest English language general encyclopedia. It is renowned for its long known accuracy on educational information as it always pass through due processes of editing and reviews by experts and professionals.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Britannica similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Britannica online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Britannica alternatives have all the features that can be found on Britannica and more.

Below are the sites like Britannica.


Wikipedia is one of the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Britannica where every person may start a page on any topic, or perhaps edit one. The article is then reviewed by an editor who ascertains if the content is staying or not. The platform is also accessible in numerous languages and to access the site you don’t have to understand English. It is probably the most frequently visited sites,usually the Wikipedia article is often times the very first item of the search engine results while you’re looking for information on Google.

Practically every page can be edited by somebody and you’re advised to be brave. Find something to enhance to make things excellent for instance punctuation, sentence structure, legibility editing, adding material, or even deleting unconstructive changes.

If you select to include additional information, please aim to comprise citations for further clarification, or even recommend them on the content site of the article. Changes to controversial subjects as well as primary segments on Wikipedia would primarily be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the methods to utilize report on and also contribute to Wikipedia on most of the fundamentals needed.

There are numerous processes in effect to support officials of Wikipedia perform the imperative exercise of providing a high-quality technique while maintaining civility. Editors can observe pages, and actually competent individuals could write modifying programs to maintain a record of or rectify weak modifications.

Where there’re differences on how to view information, editors also work in unison to build an article that’s quite reflective of current expert opinion about the subject. Before adding to the project, prospective writers may wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia information.

Though the site is actually owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is basically uninvolved in the daily operations and writing.There’s also a flexible version of the site which renders the page for phone screens perfectly. Thus if you tend to be quite minimalistic, you might have sites with no links, or just connections. Wikipedia appears to possess knowledge of any feasible scenario.If you’re searching for a specific type of web based encyclopedia, consider these Wikipedia substitutes stated below.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is an American active media firm which publishes content and clips on diverse topics across genres, including exercise, home, food, finance, technology, fashion, lifestyle, travel and education.Also, it is among the best Britannica alternatives on the internet. re-imagines how users obtain professional guides as well as web responses.

Through their advanced vertical varieties, such as Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and also the principal webpage, they aid millions of users address challenges, fix problems, and find insight on topics which they care about tremendously. is a company run by IAC.

Ever since the oncoming of, stuff has improved, though the core process remains the same. Primedia acquired the business for around $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it in accordance with Wikipedia, over 40 percent of the subject sites were closed. It was then bought out by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. also has a very modern home page and possesses a huge search box and provides many directions to find vital material. Three drop-down boxes could be used to search the websites (ranging from cars to video games), find available topics in an alphabetical index, and also find what’s hot now. The website promises 750 pros around to guide you and each issue has a podcast, a e-newsletter plus a platform for viewers.

The website has obviously changed more since started. Google aids users to browse through numerous websites for information, because they don’t need it all-in-one site. Wikipedia helps you to easily look stuff up, so there are plenty of different websites that offer more extensive information than Though is on the list of top information sites in the U . S ., generating Thirty-eight million amazing visitors monthly, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Britannica, developed and also operated by worldwide scholarly pros. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and strives to supplement it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and also science subjects such as physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In most cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are alike for example, both require somebody to propose revisions to almost any subject, they are both “wikis” and uses the famous process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all permit great independence inside the “Chat” sectors of any post,  Both are committed to make awareness of the community broadly accessible to all.

Nevertheless, Scholarpedia is better illustrated by how it is from different wikis, the differences which spring from the scholarly context, aims, and audience of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed posting method is the most vital. All publications in Scholarpedia are either in the system of being authored by a group of scholars, or have previously been released and are under competent curation.

Before publishing, first of all, new publications has to be endorsed to validate the writers’ reliability, history and also capacity to compose them, each article is susceptible to a scholarly professional analysis and requires people’s approval of at least two scholarly experts.

Soon after posting, articles appear in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be quoted as any other scholarly article. The awareness of potential revisions to an information shall be governed by the Curator of the document, usually the most renowned expert of the article at the time of publication.

When a review of an article by any person is sanctioned, the person enters a team referred to as non-author article contributors. The team of article members may work in the Curator’s stead periodically and a new Curator is elected when an article curator retires or is  otherwise unable to work.

This crossbreed process enables information from Scholarpedia to function as a path between standard peer-reviewed journals and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without reducing on excellence or reliability. It aims to eradicate the disincentives that discourage teachers from participating in online publishing and productive debate on the topics they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on for additional details on the website.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a well know site similar to Britannica for info and education, that also blends the elements of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and several almanacs filled with information, facts and also past information. The platform’s editors often renew and enhance this large array of knowledge to provide reliable and credible details and also introducing new studies and learning patterns.

The content is written and printed by professional authors, since its creation, the site has gained multiple prizes and accolades. For information on a variety of subjects, like current news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians go to Infoplease by clicking

All of the details on the site is gathered from reliable sources, like the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and also the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While posts may be limited in proportion in comparison to Wikipedia, it is certain all the information is accurate and unable to be affected by external users. Infoplease also has numerous multi-media features which help researchers, especially students enrolled in learning online courses.

To obtain approval from your website to reproduce text, pictures or maps for use in some other publications, kindly submit the request form for Permissions. Make your question as clear and comprehensive as possible, and cite the appropriate Web link. Remember, nevertheless, that much of the maps and pictures on the website are acquired by third parties, and so will not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a wonderful reference place for children, and provides them with amusement and informative services, particularly at the Homework Centre. Children will definitely enjoy their independent, award winning Factmonster website, which is customized for children aged from 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is actually a website started to be and continues to portray itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Britannica, though it is now successfully a weblog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly launched the website in 2006 out of his conviction that Wikipedia is stealthily contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since obviously the best way to conquer actual or perceived prejudice is to create a website that’s skewed in the opposing path.

The enormous number of articles on this platform go out of their way to fault practically all bad on “liberals” and so  basically employed as a grab all snarl phrase for everyone and anyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / advancement.

Although some editors seem to be frankly interested in building a comprehensive encyclopedia periodically, Schlafly and some other known active publishers / Admins are mostly utilizing it to promote their own views and pet causes. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to toe the party line on any given issue, including the usage of un-Murican British spelling is regarded as evidence that one is actually an infiltrator of the liberal style.

The home page of Conservapedia is also full of unproven discrimination focused against atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several different oppressed communities and its administrators. Check out to learn more info on the site.

Visit the site here:


Britannica is probably the largest and most popular Web sites, with replicate brands different languages. But, owing to disadvantages in its fully accessible-content system, the influence of Britannica has oftentimes been a risky one. While the site can be a reasonable kick off point for study, certainly now you know that some other substitutes to Britannica are available.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles