Sites like Citizendium | Alternatives

by Admin
39 views

Sites like Citizendium. Citizendium was founded in 2006 by Larry Sanger. The site is aimed at providing accurate and readable contents, this is achieved by allowing contributions from people. These contributions undergoes good and thorough editing and peer review by experts with certification on every given topic.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Citizendium similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Citizendium online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Citizendium alternatives have all the features that can be found on Citizendium and more.

Below are the sites like Citizendium.

1. WIKIPEDIA

Wikipedia is among the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Citizendium in which every person may start a page on any kind of subject, or edit one. The article is then checked by an editor who determines whether the content is staying or not.

The website is equally accessible in various languages in order to access the website you do not have to understand English. It is the most frequently visited sites,normally the Wikipedia commentary is most often the first item of the search results while you’re trying to find info on Google.

Practically any webpage can be modified by someone and you’re advised to be courageous. Figure something to enhance to make things perfect for instance spelling, grammar, readability touch-ups, inserting material, or deleting unconstructive modifications.

If you select to feature more info, please seek to comprise citations for clarification, or even refer them on the topic page of the post. Modifications to controversial subjects and primary sectors on Wikipedia will primarily be discussed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the means to utilize report on and add to Wikipedia on all the basics required.

There are various procedures in effect to assist representatives of Wikipedia perform the vital exercise of supplying a high-quality tool while maintaining calmness. Editors can watch sites, and theoretically certified people could write modifying programs to hold track of or perhaps resolve weak modifications.

Where there’re discrepancies about how to find evidence, editors also work together to build an article that is quite refractive of current professional view on the subject. Before contributing to the plan, aspiring authors might wish to check the Contributing to Wikipedia tips.

Although the site is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it’s largely uninvolved in the daily activities and writing.There is also a flexible version of the site which renders the page for phone screens flawlessly. Therefore if you tend to be quite minimalistic, you might have pages without links, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to possess knowledge of any possible situation.If you’re searching for a particular type of web based encyclopedia, check out these Wikipedia alternatives mentioned here.

Visit the site here: www.wikimedia.com

2. ABOUT.COM

About.com is actually an American active media corporation that publishes articles and videos on different subjects across genres, like workout, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, vacation as well as education.It’s also possibly the best Citizendium alternatives online.

About.com re-imagines how clients obtain premium tips as well as web responses. Through their premium vertical varieties, such as Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and www.about.com the primary website, they aid millions of consumers address concerns, address challenges, and find information on subjects that they treasure greatly. About.com is a business operated by IAC.

Ever since the oncoming of About.com, stuff has upgraded, but the core process is still the same. Primedia acquired the company for around $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, over 40 % of the subject sites were closed. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m.

About.com also has a rather innovative front page and it has a huge search box and provides many guidelines to find important information. Three drop-down boxes could be used to search the platforms (ranging from cars to video games), discover available subjects in an alphabetical index, and also see what is trending now. The site promises 750 experts around to assist you and every issue has got a podcast, a e-newsletter and a platform for readers.

The website has obviously improved even more since About.com started. Google helps users to flick through numerous websites for information, because they do not need it all in one location. Wikipedia aids you to easily look stuff up, therefore there are lots of various sites that provide much more detailed info than About.com. However , About.com is one of the best information websites in the United States, attracting Thirty-eight million outstanding users monthly, 61% turn out to be college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here: www.about.com

3. SCHOLARPEDIA

Scholarpedia is actually a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Citizendium, developed and also operated by worldwide scholarly specialists. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and strives to boost it by offering in-depth scholarly study of mathematics and also science subjects like physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In many cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are alike for example, both require somebody to endorse revisions to virtually any subject, they are both “wikis” and also uses the famous process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all permit substantial independence inside the “Chat” sectors of every article,  Both are committed to create awareness of the universe widely available to all.

Nevertheless, Scholarpedia is better explained by how it’s from other wikis, the differences which originate from the scholarly framework, aims, and viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing technique is the most important. All articles in Scholarpedia are generally in the method of being authored by a group of scholars, or have previously been released and are subject to competent curation.

Before publishing, firstly, all new publications must be endorsed to affirm the writers’ credibility, reputation and also capability to publish them, every write-up is under a scholarly peer analysis and requires people’s approval of about 2 scholarly professionals.

Soon after posting, information appear in the Journal of Scholarpedia and could be quoted just like any other scholarly commentary. The visibility of potential modifications to an information are governed by the Curator of the document, typically the most renowned expert of the commentary during the time of release.

If a review of an article by any individual is sanctioned, the person joins a group termed non-author article contributors. The group of article contributors can work in the Curator’s stead occasionally also a substitute Curator is picked when an editorial curator retires or is  otherwise not able to work.

This multiple process allows articles from Scholarpedia to serve as a path amid traditional peer-reviewed journals and more versatile and up-to-date wikis without reducing on excellence or credibility. It aims to eradicate the disincentives that deter lecturers from engaging in web based writing and productive conversation on the subjects they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on www.scholarpedia.org to learn more about the site.

Visit the site here: www.scholarpedia.org

4. CONSERVAPEDIA

Conservapedia is actually a podium created to be and continues to portray itself as a conservative and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Citizendium, although it is effectively a weblog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group.

God-King Andrew Schlafly founded the website in 2006 out of his conviction that Wikipedia is deceptively contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since naturally the only way to overcome real or perceived bias is to create a website that’s manipulated in the opposite path.

The overwhelming majority of articles on this website go out of their way to fault pretty much all bad on “liberals” and so  primarily used as a grab all snarl phrase for everyone and anyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / advancement.

While some editors seem to be genuinely interested in building a comprehensive encyclopedia periodically, Schlafly and a few other trusted active authors / Admins are mainly utilizing it to enhance their own opinions and pet causes. Washed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to foot the party line on any kind of subject, including the usage of un-Murican British spelling is considered to be proof that one is an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The front page of Conservapedia is also full of unproven discrimination focused towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several different oppressed groups and its moderators. Visit www.consevapedia.com to know more about the site.

Visit the site here: www.consevapedia.com

5. INFOPLEASE

Infoplease is a known site similar to Citizendium for information and learning, which also combines the elements of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and several almanacs packed with details, facts and past information. The platform’s editors constantly refresh and enhance this huge collection of information to provide adequate and reputable information as well as introducing new findings and learning patterns.

The content is authored and printed by qualified authors, also, since its creation, they have gotten multiple prizes and accolades. For knowledge on a range of topics, like current news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians check out Infoplease by exploring www.infoplease.com

All the data on the website is gathered from reliable sources, like the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and also the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. Though entries may be confined in size in comparison to Wikipedia, it is certain all the details is accurate and unable to be influenced by external visitors. Infoplease also has numerous multimedia attributes that help researchers, especially students enrolled in online courses.

To request authorization from your site to recreate text, photos or even maps for use in different articles, simply submit the application form for Permissions. Make your inquiry as obvious and detailed as possible, and cite the right URL. Remember, nevertheless, that much of the maps and photographs on the website are acquired by third parties, and so will not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a wonderful research place for youngsters, and supplies them with entertainment and educative services, specifically at the Homework Centre. Children is bound to love their separate, best rated Factmonster site, that is customized for kids aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here: www.infoplease.com

Conclusion

Citizendium is probably the biggest and most famous Web sites, with replicate versions diverse languages. Nevertheless, owing to disadvantages in its well accessible-content system, the influence of Citizendium has sometimes ended up a risky one. Even though the web can be quite a good starting point for learning, at least now you are aware that several other substitutes to Citizendium can be found.

Share this Post
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •   
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
0 comment

Related Articles