Sites like Conservapedia | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Conservapedia. Conservapedia was established in 2016 by Andrew Schlafly. He created the site to counter the liberal bias which he perceived in Wikipedia. All information on the site is written in a conservative and fundamentalist Christian point of view, so to say that American conservative Christians would love it.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Conservapedia similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Conservapedia online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Conservapedia alternatives have all the features that can be found on Conservapedia and more.

Below are the sites like Conservapedia.


Wikipedia is one of the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Conservapedia in which everyone can initiate a page on any subject, or perhaps edit one. The article is then checked by an editor who ascertains if the article is staying or otherwise.

The platform is equally obtainable in various languages and to access the website you do not have to understand English. It’s one of the most commonly visited websites, normally the Wikipedia article is often times the very first item of the search results while you’re trying to find information on Google.

Practically any webpage can be modified by someone and you’re urged to be courageous. Find something to improve to make things excellent for instance spelling, sentence structure, readability touch-ups, inserting material, or even erasing unconstructive modifications.

When you choose to include more information, make sure you seek to comprise citations for further clarification, or refer them on the topic page of the post. Changes to contentious topics as well as primary sectors on Wikipedia will usually be discussed first. Contributing to Wikipedia would provide you with the means to use review on and also add to Wikipedia on the basics required.

There are various processes in effect to support officials of Wikipedia carry out the vital task of supplying a high-quality technique while keeping calmness. Editors can watch pages, and theoretically certified people could create modifying programs to maintain record of or even resolve bad edits.

Where there’re differences on how to find information, editors work collectively to assemble a commentary that’s relatively reflective of present professional view on the subject. Before contributing to the plan, prospective authors might wish to check the Contributing to Wikipedia information.

Although the website is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is largely uninvolved in the daily activities and writing.Additionally there is a flexible edition of the website which renders the site for phone screens flawlessly. So if you choose to be very modest, you may have pages without links, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to possess knowledge of any possible situation.If you’re searching for a particular kind of online encyclopedia, check out these Wikipedia substitutes cited here.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is actually an American interactive media organization that posts articles and clips on diverse topics across genres, which includes workout, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, vacation as well as learning.Also, it is one of the best Conservapedia substitutes on the internet. re-imagines how clients obtain premium guides and web responses. Via their premium vertical brands, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the principal webpage, they aid millions of customers deal with concerns, fix obstacles, and find insight on subjects which they care about profoundly. is a company operated by IAC.

Since the oncoming of, stuff has upgraded, however the major concept remains the same. Primedia purchased the business for approximately $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it in accordance with Wikipedia, more than 40 % of the subject pages were closed. It was then bought out by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. has a rather modern home page and it has a large search box and offers various guidelines to find vital information. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the platforms (which range from cars to video games), find available subjects in an alphabetical index, or find what’s hot now. The site promises 750 pros around to help you and each subject has a podcast, a e-newsletter plus a platform for customers.

The website has obviously udgraded even more since began. Google aids users to browse through numerous sites for information, because they do not need it all-in-one location. Wikipedia helps you to easily look stuff up, thus there are loads of different websites that offer much more extensive info than But is one of the best content websites in the U . S ., generating Thirty-eight million amazing visitors a month, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is actually a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Conservapedia, invented and managed by global scholarly experts. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and strives to boost it by offering in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and science subjects like physical, chemical, behavioral and social sciences.

In several scenarios Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are alike for instance, both require a person to endorse revisions to basically any subject, they are both “wikis” and uses the famous process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all permit great freedom inside the “Chat” sections of all content,  Both are committed to make cognizance of the universe vastly available to everybody.

Even so, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it is from other wikis, the variations which originate from the scholarly framework, aims, as well as audience of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing method is the most vital. All publications in Scholarpedia are generally in the method of being written by a team of scholars, or have previously been released and are subject to professional curation.

Before publishing, first of all, all new publications has to be supported to confirm the writers’ credibility, reputation and also capacity to publish them, each article is subject to a scholarly professional review and requires the public authorization of about 2 scholarly experts.

Soon after publishing, articles appear in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be quoted as any other scholarly editorial. The visibility of possible modifications to an article are managed by the Curator of the information, usually the most known expert of the article at the time of publication.

If a review of an editorial by any individual is authorized, the individual joins a group known as non-author article contributors. The team of commentary members may work in the Curator’s stead periodically also a new Curator is picked when an article curator retires or is  otherwise not able to work.

This crossbreed approach allows articles from Scholarpedia to function as a walkway between standard peer-reviewed journals and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without compromising on quality or credibility. It aspires to eradicate the disincentives that discourage lecturers from participating in online publishing and productive discussion on the topics they know best. Explore Scholarpedia on for additional details on the site.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a known website comparable to Conservapedia for information and education, which also blends the elements of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and many almanacs filled with information, facts and past records. The platform’s editors frequently refresh and enhance this huge collection of knowledge to provide accurate and reputable details as well as presenting new discoveries and recognizing patterns.

The content is written and printed by qualified editors, also, since its inception, they have received numerous awards and honors. For information on a range of subjects, such as latest reports, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians check out Infoplease by clicking

All of the information found on the website is gathered from trusted sources, like the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. Though records could be confined in size when compared with Wikipedia, you can be sure all the information is appropriate and unable to be influenced by external visitors. Infoplease has various multi-media traits that help researchers, especially students enrolled in online courses.

To request permission from your website to replicate text, pictures or maps for use in different publications, kindly submit the request form for Authorizations. Make your inquiry as apparent and comprehensive as practicable, and quote the appropriate URL. Remember, nevertheless, that much of the maps and images on the website are acquired by third parties, and thus will not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is an excellent research place for youngsters, and provides them with entertainment and informative services, specifically at the Homework Centre. Kids will really love their separate, award winning Factmonster site, which is customized for children aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is actually a platform created to be and continues to depict itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Conservapedia, though it is now basically a website of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist community.

God-King Andrew Schlafly formed the website in 2006 from his conviction that Wikipedia is deceptively inflammed with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since naturally the only way to conquer actual or observed prejudice is to create a site that is skewed in the opposite path.

The overwhelming number of documents on this website go out of their way to blame practically all bad on “liberals” therefore  primarily used to be a grab all snarl word for everyone and anyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this appears to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climatic change / advancement.

While some editors seem to be frankly interested in building a detailed encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and some other known productive authors / Admins are mostly utilizing it to enhance their own opinions and pet causes. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to toe the party line on any kind of subject, like the use of un-Murican British spelling is considered to be proof that one is an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The home page of Conservapedia is also stuffed with unfounded discrimination focused towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and some other oppressed communities and its moderators. Visit to learn more about the platform.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is among the largest and most renowned Web sites, with mirror brands diverse languages. Nevertheless, owing to weaknesses in its fully accessible-content program, the influence of Conservapedia has sometimes been a risky one. Even though the web can be quite a fair starting point for study, certainly now you know that numerous other alternatives to Conservapedia can be found.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles