Sites like Curiosity | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Curiosity. Curiosity was introduced on 26 November 2011 from Cape Canaveral as part of NASA’S Mars Science Laboratory. The rover landed on Mars in 2012 with a primary mission to find out if Mars is, or was, suitable for life. It was created to find out more about Mars and its environs.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Curiosity similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Curiosity online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Curiosity alternatives have all the features that can be found on Curiosity and more.

Below are the sites like Curiosity.


Wikipedia is among the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Curiosity in which everyone may start a page on any topic, or edit one. The article is however checked by an editor who determines whether the content is staying or not. The platform is equally obtainable in numerous languages in order to access the website you don’t have to understand English. It’s the most frequently visited sites, normally the Wikipedia article is most often the first item of the search engine results while you are trying to find info on Google.

Nearly any page can be edited by someone and you’re advised to be courageous. Figure something to enhance to make things excellent for example punctuation, grammar, legibility editing, inserting material, or deleting unconstructive modifications. When you choose to include more info, please aim to comprise sources for clarification, or recommend them on the content page of the article.

Modifications to contentious topics and primary sections on Wikipedia would usually be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia would provide you with the methods to utilize report on and also add to Wikipedia on most of the basics required.

There are numerous steps in effect to aid officials of Wikipedia carry out the imperative exercise of supplying a high-quality technique while maintaining civility. Editors can watch pages, and technically competent people could create modifying programs to maintain a record of or rectify poor edits.

Where there are differences on how to view info, editors also work in unison to assemble an article that is relatively refractive of current expert view about the subject. Prior to adding to the project, aspiring authors might wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia information.

Although the website is actually owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is basically uninvolved in the daily activities and writing.There’s also a mobile version of the site which renders the page for phone screens flawlessly. Therefore if you tend to become very minimalistic, you may have pages without connections, or just connections. Wikipedia appears to have knowledge of any feasible situation.If you’re searching for a particular kind of web based encyclopedia, consider these Wikipedia substitutes cited below.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is actually an American active media firm that publishes content and videos on different subjects across genres, such as exercise, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, travel as well as education. It’s also among the best Curiosity alternatives online. re-imagines how clients obtain premium tips and web feedback. Via their premium vertical brands, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the basic website, they aid many consumers address challenges, address problems, and find insight on subjects that they cherish tremendously. is a business run by IAC.

Since the start of, everything has upgraded, but the major process is still the same. Primedia acquired the business for about $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, over Forty percent of the subject sites were closed. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. also has a very contemporary front page and it has a large search box and offers various directions to find valuable information. Three drop-down boxes could be used to search the platforms (ranging from cars to video games), find existing subjects in an alphabetical index, and also find what’s hot now. The website boasts 750 experts around to assist you and every issue has got a podcast, a newsletter and a platform for customers.

The website has undoubtedly udgraded more since started. Google helps clients to flick through millions of sites for information, because they do not need it all in one location. Wikipedia aids you to quickly look things up, so there are loads of different websites that offer much more detailed info as compared to But is still one of the best content websites in the United States, generating Thirty-eight million outstanding visitors per month, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Curiosity, developed and managed by global scholarly specialists. Scholarpedia is inspired by Wikipedia and also tries to boost it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and also science subjects such as physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In several cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for instance, both need somebody to propose revisions to basically any subject, they are both “wikis” and uses the famous process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  both permit substantial liberty in the “Chat” segments of every post,  Both are devoted to create cognizance of the community vastly available to everybody.

However, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it is from different wikis, the distinctions which originate from the scholarly context, aims, as well as audience of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed posting method is the most prominent. All publications in Scholarpedia are generally in the system of being written by a group of scholars, or have previously been published and are subject to competent curation.

Before publishing, first of all, all new articles must be endorsed to validate the writers’ reliability, history and capacity to write them, each write-up is subject to a scholarly peer analysis and needs the public approval of at least two scholarly professionals.

After posting, information surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be quoted as any other scholarly article. The awareness of potential revisions to an information shall be governed by the Curator of the document, typically the most known pro of the commentary during the time of release.

If a review of an editorial by any individual is sanctioned, the individual joins a team referred to as non-author article contributors. The group of article contributors can act in the Curator’s stead occasionally also a replacement Curator is chosen when an editorial curator steps aside or is  otherwise unable to work.

This crossbreed process enables articles from Scholarpedia to serve as a path amid standard peer-reviewed publications and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without reducing on excellence or credibility. It intends to remove the disincentives which deter academics from engaging in web based publishing and effective conversation on the subjects they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on for additional details on the platform.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a well know site similar to Curiosity for info and learning, which also blends the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and several almanacs packed with information, tips and past information. The platform’s editors always renew and improve this huge choice of information to provide accurate and reputable information as well as introducing new findings and learning patterns. The information is authored and publicized by qualified authors, since its inception, they have gotten many prizes and honors. For information on a range of subjects, including latest reports, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians go to Infoplease by exploring

All of the information found on the website is collected from reliable sources, such as the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and also the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. Though posts could be minimal in size compared to Wikipedia, you can be sure all the info is reliable and unable to be influenced by external users. Infoplease has many multi-media qualities that help researchers, especially students attending distance education courses.

To obtain authorization from your site to reproduce text, pictures or even maps for use in different articles, simply send the application form for Permissions. Make your inquiry as clear and comprehensive as practicable, and quote the right URL. Remember, nevertheless, that much of the maps and graphics on the site are acquired by third parties, and so will not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is an excellent reference location for kids, and provides them with entertainment and educational services, specifically at the Homework Centre. Kids will definitely love their separate, award winning Factmonster website, that is customized for kids aged from 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is a website started to be and proceeds to portray itself as a conservative and Christian fundamentalist alternative to Curiosity, although it is effectively a weblog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly launched the website in 2006 from his certainty that Wikipedia is deceptively contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since obviously the only way to defeat actual or perceived prejudice is to create a website that’s skewed in the opposing path.

The enormous number of documents on this website go out of their way to fault pretty much all negative on “liberals” so  primarily used to be a grab all snarl term for everybody and everyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climatic change / evolution.

Although some editors appear to be genuinely interested in creating a detailed encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and a few other known active publishers / Admins are generally utilizing it to enhance their own views and pet causes. Washed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to help toe the party line on any kind of issue, such as the usage of un-Murican British spelling is considered evidence that one is actually an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The front page of Conservapedia is full of unproven discrimination focused against atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several other oppressed groups and its moderators. Check out to learn more about the platform.

Visit the site here:


Curiosity is among the largest and most famous Sites, with replicate models different languages. But, owing to weak points in its well accessible-content system, the impact of Curiosity has sometimes ended up a dangerous one. While the web can be a reasonable starting place for learning, certainly now you know that numerous other alternatives to Curiosity exist.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles