Sites like Dealipedia | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Dealipedia. Dealipedia was launched in 2008 by Michael Robertson. It’s as an easy way to get information about businesses, giant mergers, IPOs, magnate investments, bankruptcy news, reading newspapers, important deals and so on.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Dealipedia similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Dealipedia online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Dealipedia alternatives have all the features that can be found on Dealipedia and more.

Below are the sites like Dealipedia.


Wikipedia is among the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Dealipedia where everyone can initiate a page on any subject, or perhaps edit one. The content is however checked by an editor who determines if the article is staying or otherwise.

The website is equally available in various languages and to access the site you don’t have to understand English. It’s the most commonly visited sites, normally the Wikipedia article is often times the first item of the search results while you’re looking for information on Google.

Practically every webpage can be modified by somebody and you are urged to be courageous. Figure something to improve to make things excellent for instance punctuation, sentence structure, legibility touch-ups, inserting material, or even deleting unconstructive modifications.

If you select to feature additional information, make sure you seek to include sources for further clarification, or even refer them on the topic page of the post. Modifications to contentious topics and primary segments on Wikipedia will usually be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the means to utilize report on and add to Wikipedia on the fundamentals required.

There are various steps in essence to assist representatives of Wikipedia carry out the imperative task of providing a quality technique while maintaining calmness. Editors can observe pages, and actually qualified individuals can write editing programs to keep record of or even rectify bad edits. Where there are discrepancies about how to view information, editors work in unison to assemble an article that’s rather reflective of present professional view on the subject. Before contributing to the plan, aspiring authors might wish to check the Contributing to Wikipedia information.

Although the site is actually owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is largely uninvolved in the daily activities and writing. Additionally there is a flexible version of the site which renders the site for phone screens flawlessly. Thus if you choose to become very minimalistic, you could have pages with no links, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to possess thought of any feasible scenario. If you are searching for a specific kind of web based encyclopedia, check out these Wikipedia substitutes stated below.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is actually an American interactive media firm which publishes articles and clips on various subjects across genres, like exercise, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, travel and learning.It is also one of the best Dealipedia alternatives on the internet. re-imagines how users gain premium tips and web responses. Through their premium vertical products, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the main site, they aid numerous customers deal with challenges, address problems, and find insight on topics which they treasure greatly. is a company run by IAC.

Ever since the beginning of, everything has improved, however the major concept is still the same. Primedia acquired the business for around $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it in accordance with Wikipedia, more than 40 percent of the subject sites were closed. It was then bought out by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. has a very modern home page and has a huge search box and gives various guidelines to locate vital information. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the platforms (which range from cars to video games), find available subjects in an alphabetical index, and also see what is hot now. The website boasts 750 professionals around to assist you and every issue has got a podcast, a e-newsletter and a platform for customers.

The website has undoubtedly udgraded more since started. Google helps customers to flick through numerous websites for materials, because they do not need it all in one location. Wikipedia helps you to quickly look things up, thus there are lots of different sites which offer more extensive information than However , is still one of the best content websites in the United States, generating 38 million unique users a month, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is actually a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Dealipedia, developed and also managed by global scholarly experts. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and tries to boost it by providing in-depth scholarly study of mathematics and also science subjects including physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In various cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for example, both need someone to endorse revisions to basically any subject, both are “wikis” and employs the popular program MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  both permit substantial independence in the “Chat” sectors of all content,  Both are committed to create cognizance of the community broadly accessible to all.

Nevertheless, Scholarpedia is better explained by how it’s from different wikis, the variations which spring from the scholarly context, aims, as well as viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed posting technique is the most prominent. All publications in Scholarpedia are generally in the system of being written by a team of scholars, or have previously been released and are subject to competent curation.

Before publishing, firstly, all new publications has to be supported to prove the writers’ reliability, history and also ability to write them, each article is under a scholarly peer review and requires people’s approval of about 2 scholarly pros.

Soon after posting, articles surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and could be quoted just like any other scholarly commentary. The visibility of potential modifications to an article are managed by the Curator of the information, usually the most renowned pro of the article at the time of release.

If a review of an editorial by any person is authorized, the individual enters a team referred to as non-author article contributors. The group of article members may work in the Curator’s stead occasionally also a substitute Curator is chosen when an article curator retires or is  actually unable to work.

This multiple process enables articles from Scholarpedia to function as a path between traditional peer-reviewed journals and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without reducing on quality or reliability. It aspires to remove the disincentives which deter academics from engaging in online writing and effective discussion about the subjects they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on to learn more about the site.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a known site like Dealipedia for information and learning, that also combines the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and lots of almanacs stuffed with information, tips and also historical records. The platform’s editors constantly renew and enhance this large array of information to provide accurate and reputable information and also introducing new results and recognizing habits.

The information is written and publicized by professional authors, since its inception, the website has gained numerous prizes and accolades. For information on a range of subjects, including current reports, popular culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians turn to Infoplease by exploring

All the information found on the website is amassed from trusted sources, such as the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. Though records may be confined in proportion compared to Wikipedia, you can be sure all the details is reliable and unable to be influenced by external visitors. Infoplease also has numerous multi-media benefits that help researchers, mainly students attending distance education courses.

To obtain approval from your website to reproduce text, images or even maps for use in other articles, kindly send the application form for Permissions. Make your question as obvious and comprehensive as feasible, and cite the right Web link. Remember, nevertheless, that lots of the maps and pictures on the website are acquired by third parties, and thus will not have the licensing rights.

Infoplease is a wonderful reference location for kids, and supplies them with amusement and informative services, particularly at the Homework Centre. Kids is bound to love their independent, top rated Factmonster website, which is customized for children aged from 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is a website created to be and proceeds to portray itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist alternative to Dealipedia, although it is now successfully a website of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist community. God-King Andrew Schlafly founded the site in 2006 out of his certainty that Wikipedia is deceptively contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since obviously the only way to defeat actual or perceived bias is to create a website that is skewed in the opposing path.

The overwhelming number of documents on this website go out of their way to blame practically all bad on “liberals” and so  primarily used to be a grab all snarl word for everybody and anyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this appears to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climatic change / evolution.

While some editors appear to be legitimately keen on building a detailed encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and a few other trusted productive publishers / Admins are mainly utilizing it to promote their own opinions and pet factors. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to help toe the party line on any kind of issue, such as the usage of un-Murican British spelling is regarded as evidence that one is actually an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The home page of Conservapedia is also stuffed with unproven discrimination focused against atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and some other oppressed groups and its administrators. Go to to know more info on the platform.

Visit the site here:

In conclusion

Dealipedia is one of the greatest and most popular Web sites, with replicate models diverse languages. However, owing to weaknesses in its fully accessible-content program, the influence of Dealipedia has sometimes been a dangerous one. Even though the website can be a fair starting place for exploration, certainly now you know that some other alternatives to Dealipedia are available.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles