Sites like Encyclopedia | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia is a long aged academic book that provides summaries on different topics, subjects, discipline or field. The books provides more detailed explanations on every given topic than that of a dictionary which is brief. The work can easily be found in libraries, schools. etc.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Encyclopedia similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Encyclopedia online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Encyclopedia alternatives have all the features that can be found on Encyclopedia and more.

Below are the sites like Encyclopedia.


Wikipedia is among the online encyclopedia sites like Encyclopedia where every person can initiate a page on any kind of subject, or edit one. The article is then checked by an editor who determines if the article is staying or not. The software is equally available in various languages in order to access the site you do not have to understand English. It is probably the most frequently visited sites,usually the Wikipedia article is often times the first item of the search results while you’re looking for info on Google.

Nearly any page can be edited by someone and you’re advised to be brave. Find something to improve to make things excellent for instance punctuation, sentence structure, legibility touch-ups, adding material, or even deleting unconstructive changes. Before you choose to incorporate more info, please seek to comprise citations for further clarification, or even recommend them on the content page of the article. Modifications to contentious subjects and significant sectors on Wikipedia would usually be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the methods to utilize report on and also contribute to Wikipedia on the fundamentals required.

There are various processes in essence to support representatives of Wikipedia carry out the important task of supplying a quality technique while keeping calmness. Editors can observe pages, and theoretically competent people can create modifying programs to keep record of or rectify weak edits. Where there’re differences about how to find evidence, editors work collectively to assemble an article that is quite reflective of current expert opinion on the subject. Prior to contributing to the project, prospective authors may wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia info.

Although the website is actually owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is basically uninvolved in the daily activities and writing.There is also a flexible version of the site which presents the site for phone screens perfectly. So if you tend to become quite minimalistic, you could have sites without connections, or just connections. Wikipedia appears to have thought of any feasible situation.If you are searching for a specific type of online encyclopedia, explore these Wikipedia substitutes cited here.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is actually an American active media firm that posts articles and clips on various subjects across genres, which includes exercise, home, food, finance, technology, fashion, lifestyle, vacation as well as education.It’s also among the best Encyclopedia substitutes online. re-imagines how clients obtain professional tips as well as web feedback. Via their premium vertical brands, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the main website, they support millions of users deal with concerns, address difficulties, and find insight on topics which they treasure greatly. is a company operated by IAC.

Since the beginning of, stuff has improved, but the major concept remains the same. Primedia obtained the business for about $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, over 40 % of the subject pages were closed. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. has a very modern front page and possesses a huge search box and gives various directions to locate vital material. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the websites (ranging from cars to video games), find existing topics in an alphabetical index, and also see what is trending now. The website promises 750 experts around to guide you and each issue has a podcast, a newsletter and a platform for readers.

The web has undoubtedly udgraded more since began. Google helps users to browse through millions of places for information, because they do not need it all-in-one location. Wikipedia helps you to easily look stuff up, thus there are loads of various sites that offer more extensive information more than However , is still one of the best content websites in the U . S ., generating 38 million unique visitors per month, 61% turn out to be college graduates and 63% female.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a renowned website similar to Encyclopedia for info and learning, which also combines the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and lots of almanacs packed with information, facts and also historical information. The platform’s editors constantly refresh and improve this huge choice of information to provide accurate and credible details and also presenting new findings and recognizing habits. The information is written and posted by qualified authors, and since its creation, the website has received numerous prizes and honors. For information on a range of subjects, like current news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians turn to Infoplease by clicking

All the details on the site is collected from trusted sources, including the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and also the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While posts may be limited in size when compared with Wikipedia, it is certain all the information is appropriate and unable to be influenced by external visitors. Infoplease also has numerous multimedia qualities that help researchers, especially students enrolled in learning online courses.

To request approval from your website to replicate text, photos or maps for use in some other articles, simply send the request form for Permissions. Make your question as apparent and comprehensive as possible, and cite the right Link. Remember, however, that lots of the maps and photographs on the site are acquired by third parties, and so do not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a wonderful reference place for children, and supplies them with entertainment and educational services, specifically at the Homework Centre. Children is bound to love their independent, award winning Factmonster website, that is customized for children aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia similar to Encyclopedia, developed and operated by global scholarly pros. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and tries to supplement it by offering in-depth scholarly study of mathematics and also science subjects like physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In many cases Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are alike for instance, both equally require someone to propose revisions to virtually any subject, both are “wikis” and also employs the popular process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all permit substantial mobility in the “Chat” sections of every article,  Both are devoted to create awareness of the community vastly accessible to all.

However, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it is from different wikis, the differences which result from the scholarly framework, aims, and viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing method is the most vital. All articles in Scholarpedia are either in the method of being authored by a group of scholars, or have already been published and are subject to professional curation.

Before publishing, first of all, all new articles must be supported to prove the writers’ reliability, history and ability to compose them, each write-up is susceptible to a scholarly peer analysis and requires the public approval of about 2 scholarly pros.

After publishing, articles surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be cited just like any other scholarly editorial. The visibility of potential revisions to an article are governed by the Curator of the information, typically the most renowned pro of the commentary at the time of release.

If a review of an editorial by any individual is authorized, the individual enters a team referred to as non-author article contributors. The team of commentary contributors can act in the Curator’s stead occasionally and a substitute Curator is elected when an article curator steps aside or is  actually unable to do the job.

This crossbreed approach allows articles from Scholarpedia to function as a path between traditional peer-reviewed publications and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without reducing on excellence or credibility. It strives to eradicate the disincentives that deter academics from engaging in online writing and productive debate on the subjects they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on to learn more about the site.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is actually a podium started to be and continues to portray itself as a conservative and Christian fundamentalist alternative to Encyclopedia, although it is now basically a blog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly established the website in 2006 from his certainty that Wikipedia is deceptively infected with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since certainly the only way to overcome actual or observed prejudice is to build a website that’s skewed in the opposing direction.

The overwhelming majority of documents on this platform go out of their way to fault practically all bad on “liberals” and so  primarily employed to be a grab all snarl phrase for everybody and anyone that argues with them  just about any particular topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / evolution.

Although some editors appear to be legitimately interested in building a comprehensive encyclopedia periodically, Schlafly and some other known active publishers / Admins are mostly using it to promote their own thoughts and pet causes. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to help toe the party line on any kind of subject, such as the usage of un-Murican British spelling is regarded as evidence that one is an infiltrator of the liberal flavor.

The front page of Conservapedia is full of unfounded discrimination directed towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and many other oppressed groups and its administrators. Visit to know more information on the site.

Visit the site here:


Encyclopedia is among the biggest and most renowned Web sites, with mirror models different languages. But, due to weaknesses in its well accessible-content program, the influence of Encyclopedia has sometimes been a dangerous one. Even though the web can be a fair starting place for exploration, certainly now you are aware that some other substitutes to Encyclopedia can be found.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles