Sites like Factbites | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Factbites. Factbites gives you the best and complete answers with themes and tones of the topic you search for unlike some other sites. The result is always comprehensive, coherent and straight to the point. It features a very crisp and razor sharp interface.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Factbites similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Factbites online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Factbites alternatives have all the features that can be found on Factbites and more.

Below are the sites like Factbites.


Wikipedia is among the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Factbites in which everyone can initiate a page on any topic, or edit one. The content is however reviewed by an editor who ascertains whether the content is staying or not.

The website is equally accessible in various languages in order to access the site you do not have to understand English. It’s the most frequently visited sites, normally the Wikipedia commentary is often times the very first item of the search results while you are trying to find info on Google.

Nearly any page can be edited by somebody and you are advised to be fearless. Find something to enhance to make things perfect for example spelling, sentence structure, readability touch-ups, inserting information, or even deleting unconstructive changes.

When you choose to include more information, make sure you aim to include sources for clarification, or refer them on the topic site of the article. Changes to contentious topics and primary segments on Wikipedia would primarily be discussed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the means to utilize review on and add to Wikipedia on most of the fundamentals required.

There are lots of steps in essence to support officials of Wikipedia carry out the vital task of providing a quality tool while maintaining civility. Editors can watch pages, and theoretically certified individuals could write modifying programs to keep a record of or perhaps resolve poor edits.

Where there’re differences on how to find information, editors also work collectively to build a commentary that’s quite refractive of current expert view about the subject. Prior to contributing to the plan, prospective writers may wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia information.

Although the site is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it’s basically uninvolved in the daily activities and writing.Additionally there is a mobile edition of the site that renders the page for phone screens perfectly. Thus if you choose to be quite modest, you could have sites without connections, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to possess knowledge of any feasible scenario.If you are searching for a particular kind of online encyclopedia, explore these Wikipedia alternatives cited here.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is actually an American interactive media corporation that publishes articles and clips on various subjects across genres, which includes workout, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, travel as well as education. It is also possibly the best Factbites alternatives on the internet. re-imagines how clients receive premium guides as well as web feedback. Via their advanced vertical brands, such as Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the principal webpage, they aid numerous customers address issues, address challenges, and find information on topics that they cherish profoundly. is a business operated by IAC.

Ever since the beginning of, stuff has improved, but the main concept remains the same. Primedia purchased the company for around $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it in accordance with Wikipedia, more than 40 % of the subject pages were locked. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. has a very innovative home page and it has a huge search box and gives various guidelines to locate valuable material. Three drop-down boxes could be used to search the websites (which range from cars to video games), discover available subjects in an alphabetical index, and also see what’s hot now. The site boasts 750 experts around to assist you and each issue has a podcast, a e-newsletter and a platform for readers.

The website has undoubtedly udgraded more since started. Google helps users to browse through various places for materials, because they don’t need it all-in-one site. Wikipedia aids you to quickly look stuff up, so there are loads of different websites which provide much more detailed information than But is still on the list of best content websites in the U . S ., generating Thirty-eight million amazing visitors per month, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Factbites, authored and also operated by global scholarly pros. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and strives to boost it by offering in-depth scholarly study of mathematics and also science subjects including physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In many instances Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are alike for example, both require somebody to endorse revisions to virtually any subject, both are “wikis” and also employs the popular system MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  both permit substantial mobility within the “Chat” sections of every post,  Both are devoted to make awareness of the universe broadly available to all.

However, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it’s from other wikis, the distinctions which originate from the scholarly framework, aims, and audience of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed posting method is the most important. All articles in Scholarpedia are generally in the system of being authored by a team of scholars, or have previously been released and are subject to competent curation.

Prior publishing, first of all, all new articles must be supported to affirm the writers’ credibility, history and also capacity to compose them, each write-up is subject to a scholarly professional review and needs people’s authorization of about two scholarly experts.

After publishing, articles appear in the Journal of Scholarpedia and could be quoted as any other scholarly commentary. The awareness of possible revisions to an information shall be governed by the Curator of the document, usually the most known expert of the commentary at the time of publication.

When a review of an editorial by any individual is sanctioned, the individual joins a team termed non-author article contributors. The team of article contributors can work in the Curator’s stead occasionally also a new Curator is chosen when an article curator retires or is  actually not able to do the job.

This hybrid process allows articles from Scholarpedia to serve as a path between standard peer-reviewed publications and more versatile and up-to-date wikis without compromising on excellence or credibility. It strives to remove the disincentives that discourage academics from participating in online writing and productive conversation about the topics they know best. Visit Scholarpedia on to learn more about the platform.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a known website similar to Factbites for information and education, that also combines the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and lots of almanacs filled with details, tips and past records. The platform’s editors frequently renew and improve this large collection of information to provide reliable and credible information and also presenting new results and recognizing habits.

The content is authored and published by competent editors, also, since its inception, the site has gotten many prizes and honors. For knowledge on a range of topics, such as current reports, popular culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians go to Infoplease by visiting

All of the information on the site is amassed from trusted sources, including the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and also the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While records could be confined in size compared to Wikipedia, it is certain all the information is reliable and unable to be affected by external visitors. Infoplease has numerous multimedia features which help researchers, mainly students enrolled in online courses.

To request approval from your site to replicate text, photos or maps for use in some other publications, kindly submit the application form for Authorizations. Make your question as obvious and comprehensive as feasible, and quote the appropriate URL. Remember, nevertheless, that lots of the maps and images on the site are acquired by third parties, and so do not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a good reference place for kids, and provides them with entertainment and educational services, specifically at the Homework Centre. Kids will definitely love their independent, best rated Factmonster website, that is tailor made for kids aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is a platform developed to be and continues to depict itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Factbites, although it is now successfully a weblog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly established the website in 2006 out of his conviction that Wikipedia is stealthily inflamed with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], because certainly the only way to defeat real or observed bias is to create a site that’s skewed in the opposing direction.

The overwhelming majority of documents on this website go out of their way to blame pretty much all negative on “liberals” so  essentially employed to be a grab all snarl term for everyone and anyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climatic change / evolution.

Although some editors appear to be legitimately interested in creating a detailed encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and a few other trusted productive authors / Admins are mostly utilizing it to promote their own thoughts and pet factors. Washed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to toe the party line on any given subject, like the use of un-Murican British spelling is considered to be evidence that one is an infiltrator of the generous style.

The front page of Conservapedia is full of unfounded discrimination focused towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and many different oppressed groups and its moderators. Explore to learn more info on the site.

Visit the site here:

In conclusion

Factbites is among the largest and most popular Sites, with mirror brands diverse languages. But, owing to weaknesses in its fully accessible-content system, the impact of Factbites has at times been a risky one. While the site can be quite a fair kick off point for exploration, at least now you are aware that several other substitutes to Factbites exist.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles