Sites like Investopedia | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Investopedia. Investopedia is an award winning site that was established in 1999 by Cory Wagner and Cory Janssen. It was afterwards acquired by Forbes in 2007. Investopedia provides financial dictionary and write ups from financial experts. The site is known for its useful services on the internet as regard to anything finance.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Investopedia similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Investopedia online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Investopedia alternatives have all the features that can be found on Investopedia and more.

Below are the sites like Investopedia.

1. Wikipedia

Wikipedia is among the web based encyclopedia sites like Investopedia where everyone can start a page on any topic, or edit one. The content is however reviewed by an editor who ascertains whether the content is staying or otherwise. The podium is also available in several languages and to access the site you do not have to understand English. It’s probably the most frequently visited websites,normally the Wikipedia editorial is often times the very first item of the search results while you’re looking for info on Google.

Nearly any webpage can be edited by someone and you’re advised to be courageous. Find something to enhance to make things excellent for example spelling, sentence structure, legibility touch-ups, adding information, or deleting unconstructive changes. When you choose to feature additional information, make sure you seek to comprise sources for further clarification, or recommend them on the topic page of the article. Modifications to controversial topics as well as significant segments on Wikipedia would usually be reviewed first. Contributing to Wikipedia would provide you with the means to utilize review on and contribute to Wikipedia on all the basics needed.

There are various steps in essence to assist officials of Wikipedia perform the important task of providing a quality technique while maintaining civility. Editors can observe sites, and actually qualified people can create modifying programs to hold a record of or perhaps rectify poor edits. Where there are discrepancies on how to find info, editors also work collectively to assemble a commentary that is relatively reflective of current professional view on the subject. Before adding to the plan, prospective authors might wish to read the Contributing to Wikipedia tips.

Although the site is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it’s basically uninvolved in the daily operations and writing.There is also a flexible edition of the site which renders the page for phone screens perfectly. So if you tend to be very minimalistic, you might have sites with no links, or just connections. Wikipedia appears to possess thought of any feasible scenario.If you are searching for a particular kind of online encyclopedia, consider these Wikipedia alternatives mentioned here.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is actually an American interactive media firm which posts content and clips on various topics across genres, such as exercise, home, food, finance, technology, fashion, lifestyle, vacation and education.It’s also one of the best Investopedia alternatives online. re-imagines how users obtain professional guides as well as web responses. Via their premium vertical products, such as Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the basic website, they aid many customers deal with issues, address problems, and get information on subjects that they cherish profoundly. is a company run by IAC.

Ever since the beginning of, stuff has improved, however the core concept is still the same. Primedia purchased the company for approximately $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, more than Forty percent of the content sites were locked. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. has a very contemporary home page and it has a large search box and gives many directions to locate important information. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the websites (ranging from cars to video games), find existing topics in an alphabetical index, or see what’s hot now. The site boasts 750 professionals around to assist you and every issue has got a podcast, a newsletter plus a podium for customers.

The website has obviously udgraded even more since started. Google helps users to flick through various sites for information, because they do not need it all in one site. Wikipedia helps you to easily look things up, so there are plenty of various sites which provide much more extensive info than Though is still one of the best content websites in the U . S ., generating Thirty-eight million unique users a month, 61% of them are college graduates and 63% female.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is actually a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia like Investopedia, authored and managed by global scholarly experts. Scholarpedia is inspired by Wikipedia and also strives to boost it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and science subjects including physical, chemical, behavioral and also social sciences.

In most instances Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for instance, both equally need a person to endorse revisions to almost any object, both are “wikis” and also employs the famous process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  both allow huge liberty in the “Chat” segments of all article,  Both are committed to make cognizance of the universe broadly available to all.

Even so, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it is from other wikis, the distinctions that originate from the scholarly context, aims, and viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed posting technique is the most vital. All publications in Scholarpedia are generally in the system of being authored by a team of scholars, or have previously been released and are under professional curation.

Before publishing, first of all, all new publications has to be supported to prove the writers’ credibility, history and also ability to write them, each write-up is susceptible to a scholarly professional evaluation and requires people’s authorization of at least 2 scholarly pros.

Soon after posting, information surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and could be cited just like any other scholarly commentary. The awareness of potential revisions to an article shall be governed by the Curator of the information, typically the most known expert of the commentary during the time of publication.

When a revision of an editorial by any individual is authorized, the individual enters a group referred to as non-author article contributors. The team of commentary contributors can act in the Curator’s stead periodically also a substitute Curator is chosen when an article curator retires or is  otherwise not able to work.

This multiple approach enables information from Scholarpedia to function as a path between standard peer-reviewed publications and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without compromising on excellence or reliability. It aims to eradicate the disincentives that discourage teachers from engaging in web based writing and productive conversation about the subjects they know best. Explore Scholarpedia on to learn more about the platform.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a well know website similar to Investopedia for information and education, that also combines the elements of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and lots of almanacs stuffed with information, facts and historical records. The platform’s editors often renew and advance this huge collection of information to provide accurate and reputable information as well as presenting new studies and learning habits.

The information is authored and published by professional editors, also, since its inception, the site has gained many awards and accolades. For knowledge on a range of topics, like latest news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians go to Infoplease by visiting

All of the information found on the website is amassed from reliable sources, including the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While articles may be confined in size compared to Wikipedia, it is certain all the info is accurate and can not be influenced by external users. Infoplease has many multi-media attributes that help researchers, mainly students enrolled in learning online courses.

To request permission from your website to replicate text, images or maps for use in some other articles, simply send the application form for Authorizations. Make your inquiry as clear and comprehensive as practicable, and cite the right Web link. Remember, nevertheless, that much of the maps and graphics on the site are acquired by third parties, and so will not have the licensing rights.

Infoplease is an excellent reference location for kids, and provides them with amusement and educational services, particularly at the Homework Centre. Kids will really enjoy their separate, award winning Factmonster site, that is customized for kids aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is a podium created to be and continues to depict itself as a conservative and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Investopedia, though it is now effectively a weblog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist community. God-King Andrew Schlafly founded the website in 2006 from his conviction that Wikipedia is deceptively contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], because certainly the best way to defeat actual or observed bias is to create a website that’s manipulated in the opposing direction.

The enormous majority of papers on this site go out of their way to blame pretty much all bad on “liberals” so  basically used to be a grab all snarl phrase for everyone and everyone that argues with them  just about any particular topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climate change / advancement.

Although some editors appear to be genuinely interested in creating a detailed encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and a few other known productive publishers / Admins are mainly utilizing it to enhance their own thoughts and pet causes. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to help toe the party line on any kind of subject, such as the usage of un-Murican British spelling is considered to be proof that one is actually an infiltrator of the generous flavor.

The home page of Conservapedia is also stuffed with unfounded discrimination directed against atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and some other oppressed groups and its administrators. Go to to learn more about the site.

Visit the site here:


Investopedia is among the largest and most popular Web sites, with replicate versions different languages. Nevertheless, owing to weaknesses in its fully accessible-content program, the influence of Investopedia has oftentimes been a dangerous one. While the website can be quite a fair starting point for learning, at least now you know that numerous other alternatives to Investopedia exist.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles