Sites like Uncyclopedia | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Uncyclopedia. Uncyclopedia was formed in 2005 by by Jonathan Huang, and this site claims to be “the content-free encyclopedia”. The site presents articles or write ups on topics like religion, prominent people, places, politics, and pseudoscience.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Uncyclopedia similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Uncyclopedia online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Uncyclopedia alternatives have all the features that can be found on Uncyclopedia and more.

Below are the sites like Uncyclopedia.

1. Wikipedia

Wikipedia is among the online encyclopedia sites comparable to Uncyclopedia where every person can start a page on any topic, or edit one. The article is then checked by an editor who determines if the article is staying or not. The platform is also obtainable in various languages in order to access the site you don’t have to understand English. It’s one of the most frequently visited websites,usually the Wikipedia commentary is most often the very first item of the search results while you’re trying to find info on Google.

Nearly any webpage can be edited by somebody and you are advised to be fearless. Find something to improve to make things excellent for example spelling, grammar, legibility editing, adding information, or erasing unconstructive modifications. If you select to incorporate additional information, please seek to include citations for further clarification, or even recommend them on the content page of the post. Modifications to controversial topics and primary sections on Wikipedia will primarily be discussed first. Contributing to Wikipedia would provide you with the methods to utilize report on and add to Wikipedia on all the fundamentals required.

There are lots of steps in effect to assist officials of Wikipedia perform the imperative task of supplying a quality technique while maintaining calmness. Editors can observe sites, and technically certified people could write editing programs to hold a record of or even resolve poor modifications. Where there are discrepancies on how to find evidence, editors work in unison to assemble an article that is quite refractive of current professional opinion on the subject. Before adding to the plan, prospective writers may wish to check the Contributing to Wikipedia tips.

Though the website is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it is largely uninvolved in the daily operations and writing.Additionally there is a mobile version of the site which renders the site for phone screens perfectly. Thus if you tend to be very minimalistic, you may have sites with no links, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to have knowledge of any feasible scenario.If you are searching for a particular type of online encyclopedia, explore these Wikipedia substitutes cited here.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is an American interactive media corporation which publishes content and videos on diverse subjects across genres, such as exercise, home, food, finance, technology, fashion, lifestyle, vacation as well as learning. It’s also possibly the best Uncyclopedia alternatives online. re-imagines how clients gain professional tips as well as web responses. Through their advanced vertical brands, such as Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and also the primary webpage, they help numerous customers deal with challenges, fix challenges, and find insight on topics that they cherish profoundly. is a company operated by IAC.

Since the oncoming of, stuff has improved, though the core concept is still the same. Primedia obtained the business for about $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, more than 40 % of the subject sites were closed. It was then bought out by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. has a very innovative front page and possesses a huge search box and provides many guidelines to locate vital information. Three drop-down boxes may be used to search the platforms (ranging from cars to video games), find available subjects in an alphabetical index, and also see what is trending now. The site boasts 750 experts around to help you and each subject has got a podcast, a e-newsletter and a platform for customers.

The web has undoubtedly changed more since began. Google aids clients to browse through numerous places for information, because they do not need it all-in-one location. Wikipedia aids you to easily look things up, therefore there are lots of different websites which provide much more detailed info more than However , is still one of the best content sites in the United States, generating Thirty-eight million unique users monthly, 61% turn out to be college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is actually a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia comparable to Uncyclopedia, developed and also operated by worldwide scholarly pros. Scholarpedia is influenced by Wikipedia and also strives to supplement it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and also science subjects such as physical, chemical, behavioral and social sciences.

In many instances Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for instance, both require someone to endorse revisions to virtually any object, both are “wikis” and employs the famous process MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  both allow substantial independence inside the “Chat” segments of all article,  Both are devoted to create awareness of the arena vastly available to everybody.

Even so, Scholarpedia is best illustrated by how it is from different wikis, the variations which originate from the scholarly context, aims, and audience of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed posting method is the most important. All publications in Scholarpedia are generally in the method of being authored by a group of scholars, or have previously been released and are subject to professional curation.

Prior posting, first of all, all new articles must be supported to affirm the writers’ credibility, reputation and ability to compose them, each write-up is susceptible to a scholarly peer analysis and needs people’s authorization of at least 2 scholarly professionals.

After posting, articles surface in the Journal of Scholarpedia and can be cited just like any other scholarly article. The awareness of potential revisions to an article are managed by the Curator of the document, typically the most known expert of the article at the time of release.

When a review of an article by any individual is certified, the person enters a group termed non-author article contributors. The group of article contributors may work in the Curator’s stead occasionally also a new Curator is chosen when an article curator retires or is  otherwise not able to work.

This crossbreed method enables information from Scholarpedia to function as a walkway amid standard peer-reviewed publications and more versatile and up-to-date wikis without compromising on excellence or credibility. It aspires to remove the disincentives which discourage lecturers from participating in web based writing and productive discussion on the subjects they know best. Explore Scholarpedia on for more information about the site.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a renowned site like Uncyclopedia for info and learning, which also combines the elements of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and lots of almanacs packed with details, tips and historical information. The platform’s editors often refresh and enhance this large array of information to provide reliable and reputable details as well as presenting new studies and recognizing patterns. The content is written and printed by competent editors, since its creation, the website has gotten many awards and honors. For knowledge on a variety of subjects, like latest reports, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians go to Infoplease by visiting

All of the data on the website is gathered from reliable sources, such as the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. Though records may be minimal in proportion when compared with Wikipedia, you can be sure all the information is accurate and unable to be influenced by external users. Infoplease also has many multimedia qualities that help researchers, mainly students attending learning online courses.

To obtain approval from your site to recreate text, photos or maps for use in other articles, simply send the request form for Authorizations. Make your inquiry as obvious and comprehensive as feasible, and quote the appropriate Link. Remember, however, that lots of the maps and graphics on the site are acquired by third parties, and thus will not have the licensing liberties.

Infoplease is a wonderful reference place for youngsters, and supplies them with entertainment and educational services, particularly at the Homework Centre. Kids will really enjoy their separate, top rated Factmonster website, which is customized for children aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is actually a website created to be and proceeds to portray itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist alternative to Uncyclopedia, though it is now successfully a website of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist group. God-King Andrew Schlafly established the site in 2006 from his certainty that Wikipedia is stealthily contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since obviously the only method to defeat real or perceived prejudice is to build a website that is manipulated in the opposite path.

The enormous number of documents on this platform go out of their way to fault practically all bad on “liberals” so  primarily employed to be a grab all snarl word for everyone and everyone that argues with them  just about any particular topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climatic change / evolution.

While some editors appear to be genuinely interested in creating a comprehensive encyclopedia periodically, Schlafly and some other trusted active authors / Admins are generally utilizing it to enhance their own thoughts and pet causes. Washed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to help toe the party line on any given issue, like the use of un-Murican British spelling is regarded as proof that one is an infiltrator of the generous flavor.

The front page of Conservapedia is also stuffed with unproven discrimination focused towards atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and many different oppressed groups and its administrators. Visit to know more information on the site.

Visit the site here:


Uncyclopedia is among the biggest and most famous Sites, with mirror brands diverse languages. Nevertheless, due to weak points in its well accessible-content program, the influence of Uncyclopedia has at times ended up a risky one. While the website can be a good starting point for exploration, at least now you are aware that some other substitutes to Uncyclopedia are available.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles