Sites like Wikinfo | Alternatives

by Admin

Sites like Wikinfo. Wikinfo was established in 2003 by Fred Bauder, as a ‘fork’ of Wikipedia. This site has some similarities and disparities with Wikipedia such as the editorial policy which is so different, the view point in which the two site narrates a story or event among other disparities. This Wikipedia inspired site is a substitute to Wikipedia with more of an open editorial policy.

In case you will like to take a look at some other Wikinfo similar sites. There are so many popular sites like Wikinfo online that you may end up not knowing the one to pick.

These group of Wikinfo alternatives have all the features that can be found on Wikinfo and more.

Below are the sites like Wikinfo.


Wikipedia is among the web based encyclopedia sites comparable to Wikinfo where everyone may initiate a page on any kind of subject, or edit one. The content is then reviewed by an editor who ascertains whether the article is staying or otherwise. The software is also obtainable in several languages and to access the site you do not have to understand English. It’s probably the most commonly visited sites,usually the Wikipedia editorial is often times the very first item of the search engine results while you are trying to find info on Google.

Practically any page can be modified by somebody and you are advised to be courageous. Find something to improve to make things excellent for example punctuation, grammar, readability touch-ups, inserting information, or even deleting unconstructive changes.

Before you choose to feature more info, please seek to include sources for further clarification, or recommend them on the content page of the article. Changes to controversial subjects and primary sectors on Wikipedia would primarily be discussed first. Contributing to Wikipedia provides you with the methods to use report on and add to Wikipedia on most of the basics needed.

There are various procedures in essence to support officials of Wikipedia carry out the important task of providing a quality technique while keeping civility. Editors can observe pages, and technically competent people could write modifying programs to hold a record of or rectify weak edits.

Where there are differences on how to view information, editors work collectively to build a commentary that is relatively reflective of present professional opinion on the subject. Before contributing to the plan, prospective authors might wish to check the Contributing to Wikipedia information.

Although the website is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, it’s largely uninvolved in the daily activities and writing.There’s also a flexible version of the site that presents the page for phone screens flawlessly. Therefore if you choose to become quite modest, you could have sites without links, or just connections. Wikipedia seems to have knowledge of any possible situation.If you are searching for a specific type of web based encyclopedia, check out these Wikipedia alternatives mentioned below.

Visit the site here:

2. ABOUT.COM is an American interactive media firm which publishes articles and videos on diverse subjects across genres, like exercise, home, food, finance, technology, trend, lifestyle, travel and learning. It’s also among the best Wikinfo alternatives online. re-imagines how clients receive premium tips as well as web feedback. Via their premium vertical varieties, like Verywell, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce and the primary webpage, they aid numerous consumers deal with concerns, fix problems, and find information on subjects which they cherish profoundly. is a company run by IAC.

Ever since the oncoming of, everything has improved, however the major process remains the same. Primedia obtained the business for about $690 m in 2000 and rationalized it according to Wikipedia, more than 40 percent of the subject sites were locked. It was then taken over by the New York Times in 2005 for $410 m. also has a rather modern front page and has a large search box and gives various directions to locate vital information. Three drop-down boxes could be used to search the websites (which range from cars to video games), find existing subjects in an alphabetical index, and also see what’s hot now. The site promises 750 experts around to guide you and every issue has got a podcast, a newsletter and a platform for readers.

The web has obviously changed even more since began. Google aids clients to browse through numerous websites for information, because they do not need it all in one site. Wikipedia helps you to easily look things up, thus there are loads of different sites that offer much more detailed info more than However , is still on the list of best content websites in the U . S ., generating 38 million unique visitors monthly, 61% turn out to be college graduates and 63% women.

Visit the site here:


Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia just like Wikinfo, developed and maintained by global scholarly experts. Scholarpedia is inspired by Wikipedia and tries to supplement it by providing in-depth scholarly analysis of mathematics and also science subjects including physical, chemical, behavioral and social sciences.

In most scenarios Scholarpedia and Wikipedia are similar for example, both need a person to propose revisions to almost any subject, both are “wikis” and employs the famous program MediaWiki for Wikipedia,  all permit great liberty in the “Chat” segments of all content,  Both are committed to make awareness of the universe vastly available to all.

Even so, Scholarpedia is better explained by how it is from different wikis, the variations that result from the scholarly context, aims, and viewers of Scholarpedia.Scholarpedia’s peer-reviewed publishing method is the most prominent. All articles in Scholarpedia are either in the system of being written by a group of scholars, or have previously been published and are subject to professional curation.

Before publishing, first of all, all new articles has to be endorsed to prove the writers’ credibility, reputation and also capability to write them, every write-up is subject to a scholarly peer review and needs the public authorization of about two scholarly professionals.

After publishing, articles appear in the Journal of Scholarpedia and could be quoted as any other scholarly article. The visibility of possible revisions to an information shall be governed by the Curator of the document, typically the most known professional of the commentary at the time of publication.

If a review of an editorial by any person is approved, the individual joins a team known as non-author article contributors. The group of commentary contributors may act in the Curator’s stead periodically and a replacement Curator is picked when an article curator retires or is  actually not able to do the job.

This multiple method allows articles from Scholarpedia to function as a path amid traditional peer-reviewed publications and more flexible and up-to-date wikis without reducing on excellence or reliability. It aspires to eradicate the disincentives that discourage teachers from participating in web based publishing and productive conversation on the topics they know best. Check out Scholarpedia on for additional details on the website.

Visit the site here:


Infoplease is a well know site like Wikinfo for information and education, which also blends the contents of an encyclopedia, a dictionary, an atlas and many almanacs filled with information, facts and also past information. The platform’s editors often boost and improve this large choice of information to provide adequate and credible details and also presenting new discoveries and recognizing habits.

The content is written and published by professional authors, also, since its creation, the website has gained multiple prizes and honors. For knowledge on a range of topics, like current news, pop culture, science, government and history, parents, teachers, and librarians check out Infoplease by exploring

All of the information on the site is collected from reliable sources, like the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia and the Unabridged Dictionary of Random House. While posts may be limited in size when compared with Wikipedia, it is certain all the info is reliable and can not be influenced by external users. Infoplease also has various multi-media benefits that help researchers, especially students attending online courses.

To obtain permission from your site to recreate text, photos or maps for use in other publications, simply send the request form for Permissions. Make your question as obvious and detailed as practicable, and cite the right Link. Remember, however, that lots of the maps and images on the site are acquired by third parties, and so will not have the licensing rights.

Infoplease is a wonderful research place for kids, and supplies them with entertainment and educational services, mainly at the Homework Centre. Children is bound to love their independent, best rated Factmonster site, which is customized for children aged between 8 to14 years.

Visit the site here:


Conservapedia is actually a platform developed to be and proceeds to portray itself as a traditional and Christian fundamentalist substitute to Wikinfo, though it is effectively a blog of the American exceptionalist and Dominionist community. God-King Andrew Schlafly founded the website in 2006 out of his conviction that Wikipedia is stealthily contaminated with “radical bias” and “atheistic bias” [note 1], since obviously the only way to defeat actual or observed bias is to build a website that’s skewed in the opposing direction.

The overwhelming majority of articles on this platform go out of their way to blame practically all negative on “liberals” and so  primarily employed as a grab all snarl word for everybody and everyone that argues with them  just about any specific topic-this seems to be everyone, skeptics, LGBT men, and/or believers in climatic change / evolution.

Although some editors appear to be frankly interested in creating a comprehensive encyclopedia from time to time, Schlafly and some other trusted productive authors / Admins are mostly using it to promote their own thoughts and pet causes. Bathed in the mere light of Conservapedian Admin LogicTM, any failure to toe the party line on any kind of subject, like the usage of un-Murican British spelling is considered proof that one is actually an infiltrator of the generous flavor.

The front page of Conservapedia is filled with unfounded discrimination directed against atheists, Muslims, LGBT men, refugees and several different oppressed communities and its moderators. Visit to know more about the site.

Visit the site here:


Wikinfo is among the greatest and most renowned Sites, with mirror models different languages. Nevertheless, owing to weak points in its fully accessible-content program, the impact of Wikinfo has sometimes been a dangerous one. While the web can be a fair kick off point for study, certainly now you know that numerous other substitutes to Wikinfo exist.

Share this Post
0 comment

Related Articles